Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge branch-24.08 into branch-24.10 #4565

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Member

Replaces #4546

Fixes forward-merge conflicts, per the process described at https://docs.rapids.ai/maintainers/forward-merger/.

Tested to be sure I got everything like this:

git grep -E '24\.8|24\.08|0\.39'

jameslamb and others added 6 commits July 19, 2024 23:55
rapidsai#4496 introduced a ceiling on `thriftpy2`. Context: rapidsai#4496 (comment)

The bug that ceiling was added to avoid was fixed in v0.5.2 of `thriftpy2`, which was just released (rapidsai#4478 (comment)).

This removes that, adding `!=` constraints to skip the 2 versions that `cugraph` was not compatible with.

## Notes for Reviewers

### Why not a floor?

I'm proposing adding `!=` constraints to skip v0.5.0 and v0.5.1 to maximize `cugraph`'s compatibility with other environments... that'd allow it to be used in environments with `thriftpy2<0.5.0` and in environments with `thriftpy2>0.5.2`.

Let me know if you'd prefer the simplicity of a floor like `>=0.5.2` instead.

Authors:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)
  - Ralph Liu (https://github.com/nv-rliu)

Approvers:
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)
  - Ralph Liu (https://github.com/nv-rliu)
  - Rick Ratzel (https://github.com/rlratzel)

URL: rapidsai#4521
… pyproject.toml's project.dependencies list (rapidsai#4530)

This change ensures RAPIDS build backend writes the correct `cugraph-service-client` package in the `cugraph-service-server` wheel's dependencies metadata.

Authors:
  - Paul Taylor (https://github.com/trxcllnt)

Approvers:
  - Mike Sarahan (https://github.com/msarahan)

URL: rapidsai#4530
This PR count the total number of triangles before testing it against the ground truth. It also remove an unnecessary sorting before testing.

Authors:
  - Joseph Nke (https://github.com/jnke2016)

Approvers:
  - Rick Ratzel (https://github.com/rlratzel)

URL: rapidsai#4549
CI is currently blocked due to these tests failing. This PR disables the
failing tests to unblock CI.
Contributes to rapidsai/build-planning#31

In short, RAPIDS DLFW builds want to produce wheels with unsuffixed dependencies, e.g. `cudf` depending on `rmm`, not `rmm-cu12`.

This PR is part of a series across all of RAPIDS to try to support that type of build by setting up CUDA-suffixed and CUDA-unsuffixed dependency lists in `dependencies.yaml`.

For more details, see:

* rapidsai/build-planning#31 (comment)
* rapidsai/cudf#16183

## Notes for Reviewers

### Why target 24.08?

This is targeting 24.08 because:

1. it should be very low-risk
2. getting these changes into 24.08 prevents the need to carry around patches for every library in DLFW builds using RAPIDS 24.08

Authors:
  - James Lamb (https://github.com/jameslamb)

Approvers:
  - Bradley Dice (https://github.com/bdice)

URL: rapidsai#4552
@jameslamb jameslamb added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jul 30, 2024
@jameslamb jameslamb requested review from a team as code owners July 30, 2024 05:24
@jameslamb jameslamb requested a review from bdice July 30, 2024 05:24
@AyodeAwe AyodeAwe merged commit f592bdb into rapidsai:branch-24.10 Jul 30, 2024
102 of 105 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I expect CI to be broken without #4562 so please request an admin merge after looking at my comment on pytorch.

@@ -666,7 +674,7 @@ dependencies:
common:
- output_types: [conda]
packages:
- &pytorch_conda pytorch>=2.0,<2.2.0a0
- &pytorch_unsuffixed pytorch>=2.0,<2.2.0a0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if we discussed this in another PR (lost track) but we don’t need the suffix here.

Suggested change
- &pytorch_unsuffixed pytorch>=2.0,<2.2.0a0
- &pytorch pytorch>=2.0,<2.2.0a0

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we definitely did! It must have been on a different PR (maybe wholegraph?). I agree, will fix this up in a follow-up PR.

@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the branch-24.10-merge-24.08 branch July 30, 2024 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
conda improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change python
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants