Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

travis doc builds are failing with no changes #203

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2015

Conversation

keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

e.g., https://travis-ci.org/radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube/jobs/61342410, and see #198 (comment)

  File "<stdin>", line 38
    print(darkred('reST markup error:'), file=sys.stderr)
                                             ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
The build_sphinx travis build FAILED because sphinx issued documentation warnings (scroll up to see the warnings).
Sphinx Documentation subprocess failed with return code 1

perhaps this is related to sphinx versions?

@keflavich keflavich changed the title travis doc builds are failing with no local changes travis doc builds are failing with no changes May 6, 2015
@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ChrisBeaumont this replaces our discussion on #198
@astrofrog has this been seen on any other affiliated packages?

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor Author

astropy/astropy-helpers#148 related?

@astrofrog
Copy link
Member

Yes: astropy/astropy-helpers#148 (comment) - just a sphinx bug, and we need to skip that version.

@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor Author

more specifically, astropy/astropy-helpers#148 (comment)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 67.06% when pulling f258721 on keflavich:sphinx_force_old into 32868c0 on radio-astro-tools:master.

keflavich added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2015
travis doc builds are failing with no changes
@keflavich keflavich merged commit 2a52d22 into radio-astro-tools:master May 6, 2015
@keflavich keflavich deleted the sphinx_force_old branch May 6, 2015 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants