-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 756
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
check function naming #1598
Comments
Yes! |
I think we should also have |
I am not really sure why the code it written as it is, having 'R-release' first in the default argument does make it seem like it would default to 'R-release', but it does default to R-devel Anyway, I agree having separate functions makes sense to me. |
Oh that is super confusing! |
Just to note that this is currently backwards incompatible and requires some coding changes in consuming packages. (now getting an error from release check in code updated for dev version).
|
This old issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with reprex) and link to this issue. https://reprex.tidyverse.org/ |
Should we rename
build_win()
tocheck_win()
andrhub_check()
tocheck_rhub()
to make the names more consistent and easier to discover?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: