Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update datagram transport parameter to one-way semantics #757

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2020

Conversation

Ralith
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ralith Ralith commented May 8, 2020

As of current master in the datagram draft, you no longer need to accept datagrams to send them. See quicwg/datagram#11.

As of current master in the datagram draft, you no longer need to
accept datagrams to send them.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #757 into master will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #757   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.89%   70.90%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines       12902    12901    -1     
=======================================
  Hits         9147     9147           
+ Misses       3755     3754    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
quinn-proto/src/config.rs 30.37% <ø> (ø)
quinn-proto/src/connection/mod.rs 79.73% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
quinn-proto/src/packet.rs 86.66% <0.00%> (+0.23%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6ac0877...0006000. Read the comment docs.

@djc djc merged commit a97f1d6 into master May 10, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the one-way-datagrams branch May 10, 2020 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants