Mandrel 21.3.3.0-Final and 22.2.0.0-Final July 2022 CPU

[Karm]

No description provided.

[Karm]

@zakkak @cescoffier https://github.com/graalvm/mandrel/releases/tag/mandrel-22.2.0.0-Final might have been in DRAFT state the second this CI was started, so if the download fails, restart the CI, please...

[zakkak]

LGTM. Thanks @Karm!

I think we should remove 22.0 mandrel modules at this point, in case you want to squeeze it in the same commit.

[Karm]

LGTM. Thanks @Karm!

I think we should remove 22.0 mandrel modules at this point, in case you want to squeeze it in the same commit.

How about we do a cleanup with the LTS? Like "when LTS comes, all previous in that major are dropped".

[zakkak]

How about we do a cleanup with the LTS? Like "when LTS comes, all previous in that major are dropped".

I recall having some issues with keeping that many images up to date, but I don't recall what the issue was. @cescoffier might have a better memory :)

[cescoffier]

The deployment will fail, unfortunately. The whole deployment process is broken since multi-archs. Look at the multi-archs branch, which proposes a completely new approach to building the images.

[Karm]

The deployment will fail, unfortunately. The whole deployment process is broken since multi-archs. Look at the multi-archs branch, which proposes a completely new approach to building the images.

I've seen the multi-archs branch. Not sure I understand how it's meant to work though.

@cescoffier Could you help me to understand what would be the best now, please?

Having updated images up and running on quay is definitely a higher priority for us than having multiarch.

Should I remove the Mandrel multiarch from the current branch, do the update and iterate async later in the multi-arch branch?

[galderz]

... The whole deployment process is broken since multi-archs...

🙈

[galderz]

@cescoffier if my gift to you (21e25a3) is to problematic, why not revert it? As I already indicated in #196, 21e25a3 is only half of the job. You need the (hacked) code in the PR to be able to push things. So, I'd be very glad for my work to be reverted and unlock @Karm's and @gastaldi's PRs.

[galderz]

#203 needs to be integrated before this PR can. Also, once integrated this PR might need to be reworked.

[Karm]

@galderz @zakkak I rebased, removed multiarch naming and also dropped old images.

[Karm]

O.K., that removal part was not a good move "Unable to find cekit module for version 21.2.0.2-Final-java11 - exiting"

fixed...

[gsmet]

Nice work, thanks!

[Karm]

Can we have the rebuild triggered now?

https://quay.io/repository/quarkus/ubi-quarkus-mandrel?tab=tags

[galderz]

@Karm Probably but I would maybe prefer to rebuild both Mandrel and GraalVM images at the same time so that they're available (roughly) at the same time. GraalVM PRs look good but still need merging (I can't do that).