Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tr/image #859

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 14, 2024
Merged

Tr/image #859

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 14, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Apr 14, 2024

Type

enhancement, bug_fix


Description

  • Added support for handling image paths in chat completions across various handlers.
  • Enhanced comment handling in GitHub app to support /ask commands with images.
  • Added functionality to identify and process image paths in PR questions.
  • Updated documentation to include guidance on asking questions about images.
  • Updated AI model configuration to use "gpt-4-turbo" for improved performance.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
base_ai_handler.py
Support Image Paths in Chat Completions                                   

pr_agent/algo/ai_handlers/base_ai_handler.py

  • Added an optional img_path parameter to chat_completion method for
    handling image paths in chat completions.
  • +1/-1     
    litellm_ai_handler.py
    Implement Image Handling in Chat Completions                         

    pr_agent/algo/ai_handlers/litellm_ai_handler.py

  • Implemented handling of img_path in chat_completion to include image
    content in messages.
  • Added error handling for inaccessible image URLs.
  • +11/-1   
    github_app.py
    Enhance Comment Handling for Image Queries                             

    pr_agent/servers/github_app.py

  • Modified comment handling to support /ask commands with images.
  • Reformat comments to ensure commands are correctly processed.
  • +7/-2     
    pr_questions.py
    Add Support for Image Path Identification in Comments       

    pr_agent/tools/pr_questions.py

  • Added method to identify image paths in comments.
  • Enhanced prediction preparation to include image paths.
  • +27/-2   
    Documentation
    ask.md
    Update Documentation for Image Queries                                     

    docs/docs/tools/ask.md

  • Updated documentation to include instructions for asking questions
    about images.
  • Adjusted image sizes in documentation for better readability.
  • +32/-3   
    Configuration changes
    configuration.toml
    Update Model Configuration to GPT-4 Turbo                               

    pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

    • Updated model configurations to use "gpt-4-turbo".
    +3/-3     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @qodo-merge-pro qodo-merge-pro bot added enhancement New feature or request bug_fix labels Apr 14, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (4683a29)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    3, because the PR involves multiple files and functionalities such as handling image paths in chat completions, updating comment handling logic, and modifying configuration settings. The changes are spread across different components, requiring a thorough review to ensure consistency and integration.

    🏅 Score

    85

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    Error Handling: The approach to error handling when an image link is not alive could be improved. Using logging and returning an error message directly from the chat_completion method might not be the best user experience. Consider a more user-friendly way to notify users about the issue.

    Hardcoded Image File Type: The method idenfity_image_in_comment seems to assume that all images will be in .png format. This might limit the functionality if images are in other formats. Consider supporting a wider range of image formats.

    Direct Requests Call: The use of requests.get directly in the chat_completion method to check if an image link is alive could introduce performance issues, especially if the link is slow to respond. Consider async requests or validating image links in a more efficient manner.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

    The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Enhancement
    Add exception handling for the image fetching process.

    Consider handling exceptions for the requests.get call to ensure the application can
    gracefully handle scenarios where the image URL is unreachable or when network issues
    occur. This will improve the robustness of the chat_completion method.

    pr_agent/algo/ai_handlers/litellm_ai_handler.py [113]

    -r = requests.get(img_path, allow_redirects=True)
    +try:
    +    r = requests.get(img_path, allow_redirects=True)
    +except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
    +    get_logger().error(f"Failed to fetch image from {img_path}: {e}")
    +    return "Failed to fetch image, please try again.", "error"
     
    Use regular expressions to extract image paths.

    Improve the method idenfity_image_in_comment by using regular expressions to extract the
    image path. This will make the method more reliable and easier to maintain, especially if
    the comment format changes.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_questions.py [80-85]

    -img_path = self.question_str.split('![image]')[1].strip().strip('()')
    +import re
    +match = re.search(r'!\[image\]\((.*?)\)', self.question_str)
    +if match:
    +    img_path = match.group(1)
     
    Maintainability
    Use regular expressions for more robust comment parsing.

    Refactor the string manipulation logic for comment_body to use more robust parsing
    methods. This will make the code more maintainable and less prone to errors if the comment
    format changes slightly.

    pr_agent/servers/github_app.py [90-91]

    -comment_body_split = comment_body.split('/ask')
    -comment_body = '/ask' + comment_body_split[1] +' \n' +comment_body_split[0].strip().lstrip('>')
    +import re
    +match = re.search(r'(/ask)(.*)', comment_body, re.DOTALL)
    +if match:
    +    command, rest = match.groups()
    +    comment_body = f"{command} {rest.strip()} \n{comment_body.split(match.group(0))[0].strip().lstrip('>')}"
     
    Refactor message formatting into a separate method.

    Instead of directly modifying the messages list based on the presence of an image path,
    consider creating a separate method to handle message formatting. This will make the code
    cleaner and separate concerns more effectively.

    pr_agent/algo/ai_handlers/litellm_ai_handler.py [119-120]

    -messages[1]["content"] = [{"type": "text", "text": messages[1]["content"]},
    -                          {"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": img_path}}]
    +def format_messages_with_image(messages, img_path):
    +    return [{"type": "text", "text": messages[1]["content"]},
    +            {"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": img_path}}]
     
    +if img_path:
    +    messages[1]["content"] = format_messages_with_image(messages, img_path)
    +
    Best practice
    Use a data class for method parameters to improve readability.

    Consider defining a separate data class or structure for the parameters of
    chat_completion, especially as the method signature grows. This will improve code
    readability and make it easier to extend in the future.

    pr_agent/algo/ai_handlers/base_ai_handler.py [18]

    -async def chat_completion(self, model: str, system: str, user: str, temperature: float = 0.2, img_path: str = None):
    +from dataclasses import dataclass
     
    +@dataclass
    +class ChatCompletionParams:
    +    model: str
    +    system: str
    +    user: str
    +    temperature: float = 0.2
    +    img_path: str = None
    +
    +async def chat_completion(self, params: ChatCompletionParams):
    +

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Comment on lines 112 to 116
    if img_path:
    import requests
    r = requests.get(img_path, allow_redirects=True)
    if r.status_code == 404:
    error_msg = f"The image link is not [alive](img_path).\nPlease repost the original image as a comment, and send the question again with 'quote reply' (see [instructions](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ask/#ask-on-images-using-the-pr-code-as-context))."
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Yes, you can write these lines in a more efficient and cleaner way. Here are some suggestions:

    1. Move the import requests statement to the top of the file: Import statements are typically placed at the top of a Python file. This makes it easier to see all external dependencies at a glance and can slightly improve performance by avoiding repeated imports.

    2. Use a single if statement: Since you're only checking for a 404 status code, you can combine the check for img_path and the request status in a single if statement. However, if you plan to handle more status codes or perform actions when img_path is not provided, keeping them separate might be more readable.

    3. Error Handling: It seems like you're preparing an error message but not using it. Consider raising an exception with the error message or handling it according to your application's error handling strategy.

    4. String Formatting: In the error message, you're trying to embed img_path within a markdown link but mistakenly used it as a literal string. You should format the string to include the variable value.

    Here's how you could rewrite the code with these suggestions:

    # At the top of the file
    import requests
    
    # Inside the function
    if img_path:
        r = requests.get(img_path, allow_redirects=True)
        if r.status_code == 404:
            error_msg = f"The image link is not alive ({img_path}).\nPlease repost the original image as a comment, and send the question again with 'quote reply' (see [instructions](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ask/#ask-on-images-using-the-pr-code-as-context))."
            # Handle the error, e.g., raise an exception or log the error
            raise ValueError(error_msg)

    This approach makes your code cleaner, more efficient by reducing the depth of conditional nesting, and ensures that the requests module is imported once at the beginning of the file. Additionally, it corrects the error message formatting to properly include the img_path variable.

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit a8d2fca into main Apr 14, 2024
    1 check passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/image branch April 14, 2024 11:14
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants