Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nick iswap #864

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Dec 19, 2022
Merged

Nick iswap #864

merged 30 commits into from
Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

nalanzil
Copy link
Collaborator

What are the issues this pull addresses (issue numbers / links)?

This PR adds three new components and a demo notebook for full chip design which calls on each of the three components.

Did you add tests to cover your changes (yes/no)?

Yes

Did you update the documentation accordingly (yes/no)?

Yes

Did you read the CONTRIBUTING document (yes/no)?

Yes

Summary

Three new components: concentric qubit, lumped resonator, tunable coupler
New demo notebook: Full physical design of three different iSWAP gates from the literature

Details and comments

@nalanzil nalanzil added the documentation & tutorials Improvements or additions to docs and tutorials label Oct 21, 2022
@nalanzil nalanzil marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2022 19:14
Copy link
Collaborator

@priti-ashvin-shah-ibm priti-ashvin-shah-ibm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the 3rd diagram, the vertices are not filleted. They segments appear to be long enough so they should be filleted. It would be nice to get them to fillet.

Copy link
Collaborator

@priti-ashvin-shah-ibm priti-ashvin-shah-ibm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great Work, LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@ThomasGM4 ThomasGM4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it looks good.

Might be some conflicts with the Gmsh render (polygons overlapping), and junctions between curved poly have some issues atm (as either end up having overlapping impedance sheets with Metals, or lack of galvanic contacts).

Did you find an EPR analysis worked ok with transmon_concentric_type_2?

I would say it can get merged and then tested, or if want to test it quick first (either is good)

@priti-ashvin-shah-ibm priti-ashvin-shah-ibm merged commit 85cc491 into main Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation & tutorials Improvements or additions to docs and tutorials
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants