Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore/release-3.2.8 #606

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

chore/release-3.2.8 #606

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

dylanpulver
Copy link
Collaborator

@dylanpulver dylanpulver commented Sep 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced version comparison logic for the check-updates command.
    • Introduction of a script to generate a CONTRIBUTORS.md file with Shields.io badges.
    • Addition of a new LICENSES.md file to document licenses of dependencies.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog with release notes for version 3.2.8.
    • Added a demo Jupyter Notebook and a new SECURITY.md file detailing security policy and bug bounty information.
    • Refined CLI help text for a cleaner output.
  • Versioning

    • Software version updated from 3.2.7 to 3.2.8.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces version 3.2.8, updating the changelog with notable enhancements, including improvements to the check-updates command, documentation updates, and the addition of several new files. A script for generating a CONTRIBUTORS.md file has been added, along with a SECURITY.md file outlining security policies. The version number has been incremented from 3.2.7 to 3.2.8, reflecting these updates.

Changes

Files Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Updated with release notes for version 3.2.8, including enhancements, documentation updates, and new files.
safety/VERSION Version number updated from 3.2.7 to 3.2.8.

Poem

In the meadow where bunnies play,
Changes hop in a joyful ballet.
With badges bright and docs so neat,
Version 3.2.8 is quite the treat!
Let's celebrate with a cheerful cheer,
For every update brings us near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

8-15: Consider adding a brief summary for version 3.2.8.

The changelog entries for version 3.2.8 are well-formatted and informative. To enhance readability and provide a quick overview, consider adding a brief summary or highlight of the most significant changes at the beginning of the version entry. This summary could help users quickly understand the key updates in this release.

Here's a suggested format:

 ## [3.2.8] - 2024-09-27
+
+Key updates:
+- Enhanced version comparison logic for check-updates command
+- Added demo Jupyter Notebook and new documentation files (CONTRIBUTORS.md, LICENSES.md, SECURITY.md)
+- Improved CLI help text and system scan visibility
+
 - feat: enhance version comparison logic for check-updates command (#605)
 - docs: add demo Jupyter Notebook (#601)
 - feat: add script to generate CONTRIBUTORS.md with Shields.io badges based on merged PRs (#600)
 - chore: fix CLI help text by removing rich formatting for cleaner output (#599)
 - chore: hide system scan from help text (#598)
 - chore: add LICENSES.md file to document dependency licenses (#597)
 - docs: add SECURITY.md file with security policy and bug bounty details (#593)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dec98e0 and ac032bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • safety/VERSION (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • safety/VERSION
🔇 Additional comments (7)
CHANGELOG.md (7)

9-9: LGTM! Well-formatted changelog entry.

The entry follows the conventional commit format, clearly stating the type of change (feature) and what was modified. Including the pull request number (#605) is helpful for tracking the change.


10-10: LGTM! Clear and concise changelog entry.

This entry adheres to the conventional commit format, specifying the change type (docs) and the addition made. The inclusion of the pull request number (#601) is beneficial for traceability.


11-11: LGTM! Detailed and informative changelog entry.

This entry follows the conventional commit format and provides a comprehensive description of the new feature. The inclusion of the pull request number (#600) is helpful. This entry aligns with the information provided in the AI-generated summary about alterations to exported entities, specifically the addition of the generate_CONTRIBUTORS_md() script.


12-12: LGTM! Well-structured changelog entry.

This entry adheres to the conventional commit format, clearly indicating the change type (chore) and the modification made to the CLI help text. The inclusion of the pull request number (#599) aids in tracking the change.


13-13: LGTM! Concise and clear changelog entry.

This entry follows the conventional commit format, specifying the change type (chore) and the modification made to the help text. The inclusion of the pull request number (#598) is beneficial for reference.


14-14: LGTM! Informative changelog entry.

This entry adheres to the conventional commit format, clearly indicating the change type (chore) and the addition of the LICENSES.md file. The inclusion of the pull request number (#597) is helpful. This entry aligns with the information provided in the AI-generated summary about the addition of a new LICENSES.md file to document dependency licenses.


15-15: LGTM! Well-documented changelog entry.

This entry follows the conventional commit format, specifying the change type (docs) and the addition of the SECURITY.md file. The inclusion of the pull request number (#593) is beneficial for traceability. This entry aligns with the information provided in the AI-generated summary about the addition of a new SECURITY.md file detailing the security policy and bug bounty information.

Copy link
Member

@yeisonvargasf yeisonvargasf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🚀

@dylanpulver dylanpulver merged commit 31b1821 into main Sep 27, 2024
12 checks passed
@dylanpulver dylanpulver deleted the chore/release-3.2.8 branch September 27, 2024 22:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants