-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Negative padding for functional_tensor symmetric #2749
Negative padding for functional_tensor symmetric #2749
Conversation
Along with pytorch#2744 this will make negative padding uniform between PIL and Tensor pytorch#2381
@jamt9000 thanks for the PR. I merged your previous PR, can you please update this one and add missing tests and fix currently failing one. Thanks ! |
9dc0602
to
2cbf368
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2749 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.08% 73.09%
=======================================
Files 96 96
Lines 8319 8321 +2
Branches 1293 1295 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 6080 6082 +2
Misses 1840 1840
Partials 399 399
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks @jamt9000 !
* Negative padding for functional_tensor symmetric Along with pytorch#2744 this will make negative padding uniform between PIL and Tensor pytorch#2381 * Enable tests for negative symmetric pad with tensor Co-authored-by: vfdev <vfdev.5@gmail.com>
* Negative padding for functional_tensor symmetric Along with pytorch#2744 this will make negative padding uniform between PIL and Tensor pytorch#2381 * Enable tests for negative symmetric pad with tensor Co-authored-by: vfdev <vfdev.5@gmail.com>
Along with #2744 this will make negative padding
uniform between PIL and Tensor #2381
The natural test would be not excluding "symmetric" here but that relies on the changes in #2744 so I haven't included it here yet.