-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes #5922
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/5922
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit d248d71 with merge base a6b213b (): This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Differential Revision: D63926846
145768e
to
f3322ee
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
@neuropilot-captain can you take a look at this? |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
f3322ee
to
9fc0132
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
9fc0132
to
43e01d7
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
1 similar comment
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
43e01d7
to
37954d2
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
37954d2
to
2a00a51
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
2a00a51
to
9b684f8
Compare
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
9b684f8
to
413fdbd
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
413fdbd
to
0d8f377
Compare
Differential Revision: D63926849
Differential Revision: D63926845
Differential Revision: D63926847
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
0d8f377
to
c754771
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
c754771
to
44577eb
Compare
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
Should update the import statement in It currently use |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846 |
44577eb
to
d248d71
Compare
This pull request has been merged in e540bcb. |
@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/0.4 -c critical |
Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846 fbshipit-source-id: fcea1a560892200f9ca0e110104908de0be25867 (cherry picked from commit e540bcb)
Cherry picking #5922The cherry pick PR is at #6089 and it is recommended to link a critical cherry pick PR with an issue. The following tracker issues are updated: Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
Move mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes (#5922) Summary: Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee. Pull Request resolved: #5922 Reviewed By: helunwencser Differential Revision: D63926846 fbshipit-source-id: fcea1a560892200f9ca0e110104908de0be25867 (cherry picked from commit e540bcb) Co-authored-by: Tarun Karuturi <tkaruturi@meta.com>
Differential Revision: D63926846