Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes #5922

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

tarun292
Copy link
Contributor

@tarun292 tarun292 commented Oct 6, 2024

Differential Revision: D63926846

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 6, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/5922

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit d248d71 with merge base a6b213b (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Oct 6, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

@cccclai
Copy link
Contributor

cccclai commented Oct 7, 2024

@neuropilot-captain can you take a look at this?

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
Differential Revision: D63926849
Differential Revision: D63926845
Differential Revision: D63926847
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

tarun292 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@neuropilot-captain
Copy link
Contributor

Should update the import statement in backends/mediatek/quantizer/quantizer.py file as well?

It currently use from ..passes.decompose_scaled_dot_product_attention import ...

Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63926846

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in e540bcb.

@tarun292
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/0.4 -c critical

pytorchbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846

fbshipit-source-id: fcea1a560892200f9ca0e110104908de0be25867
(cherry picked from commit e540bcb)
@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry picking #5922

The cherry pick PR is at #6089 and it is recommended to link a critical cherry pick PR with an issue. The following tracker issues are updated:

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

dbort pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Move mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes (#5922)

Summary:
Changing mediatek.passes to mediatek._passes to indicate that these passes are not covered under the API stability guarantee.

Pull Request resolved: #5922

Reviewed By: helunwencser

Differential Revision: D63926846

fbshipit-source-id: fcea1a560892200f9ca0e110104908de0be25867
(cherry picked from commit e540bcb)

Co-authored-by: Tarun Karuturi <tkaruturi@meta.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants