seperate quantize and export_to_edge in builder #3613
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/3613
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 284a928 with merge base 5c70121 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57367832 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2024
Summary: Currently export_to_edge includes both applying quantizer and run to_edge, separate them so I can call quantize only in the eval_llama.py Differential Revision: D57367832
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57367832 |
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2024
Summary: Currently export_to_edge includes both applying quantizer and run to_edge, separate them so I can call quantize only in the eval_llama.py Differential Revision: D57367832
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57367832 |
Jack-Khuu
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
cccclai
added a commit
to cccclai/executorch-1
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2024
Summary: Currently export_to_edge includes both applying quantizer and run to_edge, separate them so I can call quantize only in the eval_llama.py Reviewed By: Jack-Khuu, larryliu0820 Differential Revision: D57367832
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57367832 |
Summary: Currently export_to_edge includes both applying quantizer and run to_edge, separate them so I can call quantize only in the eval_llama.py Reviewed By: Jack-Khuu, larryliu0820 Differential Revision: D57367832
|
This pull request has been merged in 0364d45. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: Currently export_to_edge includes both applying quantizer and run to_edge, separate them so I can call quantize only in the eval_llama.py
Differential Revision: D57367832