Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify is_non_dominated behavior with NaN #2332

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

saitcakmak
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Since <= & >= always evaluate to False with NaN elements of tensors, this counts NaNs as dominated point, which is the desired behavior.

Differential Revision: D56945207

Summary: Since `<=` & `>=` always evaluate to False with NaN elements of tensors, this counts NaNs as dominated point, which is the desired behavior.

Differential Revision: D56945207
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label May 3, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56945207

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.97%. Comparing base (dd6ef71) to head (10a9348).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2332   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.97%   99.97%           
=======================================
  Files         189      189           
  Lines       16669    16669           
=======================================
  Hits        16665    16665           
  Misses          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in f1fca01.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants