Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FullyBayesian LogEI #2058

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

SebastianAment
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute

LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),

by replacing mean with logsumexp in t_batch_mode_transform, where f is the GP with hyper-parameters SAAS evaluated at x. Without the change, the acqf would compute

ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].

Differential Revision: D50413044

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Oct 18, 2023
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2058 (e57fe9c) into main (8cdc595) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head e57fe9c differs from pull request most recent head 1bd4071. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1bd4071 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #2058   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          179       179           
  Lines        15918     15926    +8     
=========================================
+ Hits         15918     15926    +8     
Files Coverage Δ
botorch/acquisition/acquisition.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
botorch/acquisition/analytic.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
botorch/acquisition/multi_objective/logei.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
botorch/utils/transforms.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2023
Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Reviewed By: dme65, Balandat

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Reviewed By: dme65, Balandat

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

SebastianAment added a commit to SebastianAment/botorch that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Reviewed By: dme65, Balandat

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

Summary:

This commit adds support for combining LogEI acquisition functions with fully Bayesian models. In particular, the commit adds the option to compute
```
LogEI(x) = log( E_SAAS[ E_f[ f_SAAS(x) ] ] ),
```
by replacing `mean` with `logsumexp` in `t_batch_mode_transform`, where `f` is the GP with hyper-parameters `SAAS` evaluated at `x`. Without the change, the acqf would compute
```
ELogEI(x) = E_SAAS[ log( E_f[ f_SAAS(x)] ) ].
```

Reviewed By: dme65, Balandat

Differential Revision: D50413044
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D50413044

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 0af3ca5.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants