Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 696: Add section on binding rules #3427

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2023

Conversation

Gobot1234
Copy link
Contributor

@Gobot1234 Gobot1234 commented Sep 7, 2023

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3427.org.readthedocs.build/

@Gobot1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @erictraut as this requires changes to pyright

erictraut pushed a commit to microsoft/pyright that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2023
…696 when a class type parameter has a default type and that class is bound to one of its methods. See python/peps#3427 (comment) for details.
@erictraut
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me. I've updated the logic in pyright accordingly.

@JelleZijlstra
Copy link
Member

This looks good, but there's a merge conflict that can't be resolved manually. Could you fix it?

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit 94ac129 into python:main Sep 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants