Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-43224: Add tests for TypeVarTuple substitution in Annotated #31846

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2022

Conversation

mrahtz
Copy link
Contributor

@mrahtz mrahtz commented Mar 13, 2022

At some point I guess we should add tests for the native tuple too, once #31828 or similar is in.

@JelleZijlstra Does this assuage the concerns you mentioned about Annotated in #31021 (review)?

@@GBeauregard too, since Jelle also mentioned you in that thread - is there anything else we should test for here?

https://bugs.python.org/issue43224

Copy link
Member

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! The tests are good but it's a bit unfortunate if we can't use Annotated around a TypeVarTuple at all.

@@ -2046,6 +2057,9 @@ def __class_getitem__(cls, params):
raise TypeError("Annotated[...] should be used "
"with at least two arguments (a type and an "
"annotation).")
if _is_unpacked_typevartuple(params[0]):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to explicitly disallow this at runtime.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, but then how should we handle situations like this?

A = Annotated[Unpack[Ts], "foo"]
B = A[int, str]

Annotated[int, str, "foo"] wouldn't be valid. We could do some kind of automatic tuple wrapping, Annotated[tuple[int, str], "foo", but that would be inconsistent with how we handle TypeVarTuple substitution elsewhere.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, and sorry for not responding to this earlier.

@mrahtz mrahtz mannequin mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra self-requested a review April 15, 2022 23:11
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra self-assigned this Apr 15, 2022
@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra merged commit f2bc12f into python:main Apr 16, 2022
@mrahtz mrahtz deleted the annotated-typevartuple branch May 1, 2022 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants