bpo-45753: Make recursion checks more efficient. #29524
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
markshannon
force-pushed
the
speed-up-recursion-check
branch
from
cb874c6 to
84ee4cd
Compare
markshannon
force-pushed
the
speed-up-recursion-check
branch
from
6f138bd to
0c65e85
Compare
markshannon
added
the
🔨 test-with-buildbots
|
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @markshannon for commit 86f2960 🤖 If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the ":hammer: test-with-buildbots" label again. |
bedevere-bot
removed
the
🔨 test-with-buildbots
|
Failing buildbots are:
|
remykarem
pushed a commit
to remykarem/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2021
* Uses recursion remaining, instead of recursion depth to speed up check against recursion limit.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should, in theory, be faster.
Seems to provide a small speedup when tested.
https://bugs.python.org/issue45753