gh-119180: Documentation for PEP 649 and 749

Doc/glossary.rst

@@ -36,19 +36,24 @@ Glossary
       and loaders (in the :mod:`importlib.abc` module).  You can create your own
       ABCs with the :mod:`abc` module.
 
+   annotate function
+      A function that can be called to retrieve the :term:`annotations <annotation>`
+      of an object. This function is accessible as the :attr:`~object.__annotate__`
+      attribute of functions, classes, and modules. Annotate functions are a
+      subset of :term:`evaluate functions <evaluate function>`.
+
    annotation
       A label associated with a variable, a class
       attribute or a function parameter or return value,
       used by convention as a :term:`type hint`.
 
       Annotations of local variables cannot be accessed at runtime, but
       annotations of global variables, class attributes, and functions
-      are stored in the :attr:`__annotations__`
-      special attribute of modules, classes, and functions,
-      respectively.
+      can be retrieved by calling :func:`annotationlib.get_annotations`
+      on modules, classes, and functions, respectively.
 
-      See :term:`variable annotation`, :term:`function annotation`, :pep:`484`
-      and :pep:`526`, which describe this functionality.
+      See :term:`variable annotation`, :term:`function annotation`, :pep:`484`,
+      :pep:`526`, and :pep:`649`, which describe this functionality.
       Also see :ref:`annotations-howto`
       for best practices on working with annotations.
 
@@ -366,6 +371,11 @@ Glossary
       statements.  The technique contrasts with the :term:`LBYL` style
       common to many other languages such as C.
 
+   evaluate function
+      A function that can be called to evaluate a lazily evaluated attribute
+      of an object, such as the value of type aliases created with the :keyword:`type`
+      statement.
+
    expression
       A piece of syntax which can be evaluated to some value.  In other words,
       an expression is an accumulation of expression elements like literals,

Doc/howto/annotations.rst

@@ -34,11 +34,16 @@ Accessing The Annotations Dict Of An Object In Python 3.10 And Newer
 
 Python 3.10 adds a new function to the standard library:
 :func:`inspect.get_annotations`.  In Python versions 3.10
-and newer, calling this function is the best practice for
+through 3.13, calling this function is the best practice for
 accessing the annotations dict of any object that supports
 annotations.  This function can also "un-stringize"
 stringized annotations for you.
 
+In Python 3.14, there is a new :mod:`annotationlib` module
+with functionality for working with annotations. This
+includes a :func:`annotationlib.get_annotations` function,
+which supersedes :func:`inspect.get_annotations`.
+
 If for some reason :func:`inspect.get_annotations` isn't
 viable for your use case, you may access the
 ``__annotations__`` data member manually.  Best practice
@@ -184,7 +189,11 @@ Best Practices For ``__annotations__`` In Any Python Version
 * If you do assign directly to the ``__annotations__`` member
   of an object, you should always set it to a ``dict`` object.
 
-* If you directly access the ``__annotations__`` member
+* You should avoid accessing ``__annotations__`` directly on any object.
+  Instead, use :func:`annotationlib.get_annotations` (Python 3.14+)
+  or :func:`inspect.get_annotations` (Python 3.10+).
+
+* If you do directly access the ``__annotations__`` member
   of an object, you should ensure that it's a
   dictionary before attempting to examine its contents.
 
@@ -231,3 +240,11 @@ itself be quoted.  In effect the annotation is quoted
 
 This prints ``{'a': "'str'"}``.  This shouldn't really be considered
 a "quirk"; it's mentioned here simply because it might be surprising.
+
+When you use a class with a custom metaclass and access ``__annotations__``
+on the class, you may observe unexpected behavior; see
+:pep:`749 <749#pep749-metaclasses>` for some examples. You can avoid these
+quirks by using :func:`annotationlib.get_annotations` on Python 3.14+ or
+:func:`inspect.get_annotations` on Python 3.10+. On earlier versions of
+Python, you can avoid these bugs by accessing the annotations from the
+class's ``__dict__`` (e.g., ``cls.__dict__.get('__annotations__', None)``).

Doc/library/__future__.rst

@@ -64,8 +64,10 @@ language using this mechanism:
 | generator_stop   | 3.5.0b1     | 3.7          | :pep:`479`:                                 |
 |                  |             |              | *StopIteration handling inside generators*  |
 +------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+
-| annotations      | 3.7.0b1     | TBD [1]_     | :pep:`563`:                                 |
-|                  |             |              | *Postponed evaluation of annotations*       |
+| annotations      | 3.7.0b1     | Never [1]_   | :pep:`563`:                                 |
+|                  |             |              | *Postponed evaluation of annotations*,      |
+|                  |             |              | :pep:`649`: *Deferred evalutation of        |
+|                  |             |              | annotations using descriptors*              |
 +------------------+-------------+--------------+---------------------------------------------+
 
 .. XXX Adding a new entry?  Remember to update simple_stmts.rst, too.
@@ -115,11 +117,9 @@ language using this mechanism:
 
 .. [1]
    ``from __future__ import annotations`` was previously scheduled to
-   become mandatory in Python 3.10, but the Python Steering Council
-   twice decided to delay the change
-   (`announcement for Python 3.10 <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/CLVXXPQ2T2LQ5MP2Y53VVQFCXYWQJHKZ/>`__;
-   `announcement for Python 3.11 <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/VIZEBX5EYMSYIJNDBF6DMUMZOCWHARSO/>`__).
-   No final decision has been made yet. See also :pep:`563` and :pep:`649`.
+   become mandatory in Python 3.10, but the change was delayed and ultimately
+   canceled. This feature will eventually be deprecated and removed. See
+   :pep:`649` and :pep:`749`.
 
 
 .. seealso::