gh-118912: Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide #119232
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement. |
bedevere-app
bot
added
docs
nedbat
approved these changes
May 20, 2024
willingc
approved these changes
May 20, 2024
willingc
added
needs backport to 3.12
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…eccing guide (pythonGH-119232) * Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide * Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace * Add linting changes (missed in last commit) --------- (cherry picked from commit 7e57640) Co-authored-by: Shauna <shaunagm@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…eccing guide (pythonGH-119232) * Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide * Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace * Add linting changes (missed in last commit) --------- (cherry picked from commit 7e57640) Co-authored-by: Shauna <shaunagm@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
|
GH-119283 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
|
GH-119284 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
willingc
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…peccing guide (GH-119232) (#119283) gh-118912: Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide (GH-119232) * Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide * Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace * Add linting changes (missed in last commit) --------- (cherry picked from commit 7e57640) Co-authored-by: Shauna <shaunagm@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
willingc
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…peccing guide (GH-119232) (#119284) gh-118912: Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide (GH-119232) * Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide * Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace * Add linting changes (missed in last commit) --------- (cherry picked from commit 7e57640) Co-authored-by: Shauna <shaunagm@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
estyxx
pushed a commit
to estyxx/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2024
…eccing guide (python#119232) * Remove description of issue fixed in 3.5 from autospeccing guide * Make autospeccing note text more succint and lint whitespace * Add linting changes (missed in last commit) --------- Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: I am a first-time contributor, so apologies if I've missed some important norms or processes.
This is an attempt to fix #118912 by removing the description of a bug that was removed in Python 3.5. I noticed that elsewhere in the documentation there were comments about when something had been added or removed or changed, so I tried using that here. Not sure if that was actually appropriate.
I had one other question: the autospeccing guide feels a little out of place here. Everything else seems to be primarily for reference, while this guide feels like more of a howto. Should it be moved to a howto section, and merely linked here? If we want to keep it in this part of the docs, should it be moved next to create_autospec or even submerged into it? Eager to get your thoughts on this question, and to get overall feedback on this PR.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--119232.org.readthedocs.build/