Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-87106: Fix inspect.signature.bind handling of positional-only arguments with **kwargs #103404

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Contributor

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls commented Apr 10, 2023

gh-87106
Closes #87106

If a function signature has a variadic keyword argument (like **kwargs), then providing a keyword with the same name as a positional-only argument will still succeed, and become available on kwargs.

Before
inspect.signature(f).bind(pos_only='val') might either:

  • raise TypeError unnecessarily if the positional-only arg had a default
  • raise TypeError with a different flavor of error message than runtime (runtime mentions the missing positional arg, but bind() mentioned the name collision, which wasn't the problem)

Now
These are fixed.

Prior related work
#16800

Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@sobolevn sobolevn requested a review from larryhastings April 10, 2023 06:44
@jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 @sobolevn would you be interested to take another look?

Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree with the fix in general. However, there are still some things to polish and improve :)

Thanks a lot for your work!

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls requested a review from sobolevn May 5, 2024 15:15
@jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

jacobtylerwalls commented May 5, 2024

Thanks for your suggestions, @sobolevn. Should I move some of the new cases to test_signature_bind_posonly_kwargs()?

Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@serhiy-storchaka do you have any additional feedback?

Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka merged commit 9c15202 into python:main May 13, 2024
33 checks passed
@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka added needs backport to 3.12 bug and security fixes needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes labels May 13, 2024
@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @jacobtylerwalls for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @jacobtylerwalls for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…nly arguments with **kwargs (pythonGH-103404)

(cherry picked from commit 9c15202)

Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <jacobtylerwalls@gmail.com>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…nly arguments with **kwargs (pythonGH-103404)

(cherry picked from commit 9c15202)

Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <jacobtylerwalls@gmail.com>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 13, 2024

GH-118984 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.12 bug and security fixes label May 13, 2024
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented May 13, 2024

GH-118985 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes label May 13, 2024
serhiy-storchaka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…only arguments with **kwargs (GH-103404) (GH-118984)

(cherry picked from commit 9c15202)

Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <jacobtylerwalls@gmail.com>
serhiy-storchaka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
…only arguments with **kwargs (GH-103404) (#118985)

(cherry picked from commit 9c15202)

Co-authored-by: Jacob Walls <jacobtylerwalls@gmail.com>
estyxx pushed a commit to estyxx/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls deleted the issue-87106 branch February 15, 2025 23:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect behavior of inspect.signature(f).bind
4 participants