Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gh-101409: Improve generated clinic code for self type checks #101411

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 31, 2023
Merged

gh-101409: Improve generated clinic code for self type checks #101411

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 31, 2023

Conversation

erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland commented Jan 29, 2023 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

Store the self type pointer in a local variable.

@erlend-aasland
pythongh-101409: Improve generated clinic code for self type checks
056abc4 
Store the self type pointer in a local variable.
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2023
Closed
@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc. @colorfulappl

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2023
Merged
@rhettinger rhettinger removed their request for review January 29, 2023 23:53
@colorfulappl
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if this improvement is worth it, though; it may be churn for no benefit.

IMHO, this improvement is worth it.

  1. If the clinic_state() macro is fairly complicated, the compiler won't eliminate the redundant function invocations.

  2. The generated code after this patch is more concise and readable.

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. If the clinic_state() macro is fairly complicated, the compiler won't eliminate the redundant function invocations.

That is true; we cannot guarantee that the compiler will eliminate the redundant calls.

  1. The generated code after this patch is more concise and readable.

I agree with this.

Thanks for the review, @colorfulappl; highly appreciated.

serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka reviewed Jan 30, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

self_tp may be not a good name. It is not a type of self. Maybe base_type or declared_type or something?

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor Author

self_tp may be not a good name. It is not a type of self. Maybe base_type or declared_type or something?

base_type sounds good; thanks!

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor Author

erlend-aasland commented Jan 31, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I'm considering landing this PR in a day or two. With three thumbs up, I'm landing this tonight.

kumaraditya303
kumaraditya303 approved these changes Jan 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland merged commit 2753cf2 into python:main Jan 31, 2023
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland deleted the clinic/self-type-check branch January 31, 2023 20:42
@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the reviews, y'all!

carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2023
@carljm
Merge branch 'main' into inlinecomp2
db208d5 
* main:
  pythonGH-100288: Skip extra work when failing to specialize LOAD_ATTR (pythonGH-101354)
  pythongh-101409: Improve generated clinic code for self type checks (python#101411)
  pythongh-98831: rewrite BEFORE_ASYNC_WITH and END_ASYNC_FOR in the instruction definition DSL (python#101458)
  pythongh-101469: Optimise get_io_state() by using _PyModule_GetState() (pythonGH-101470)
@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 kumaraditya303 approved these changes

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka approved these changes

@ethanfurman ethanfurman Awaiting requested review from ethanfurman ethanfurman is a code owner

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag Awaiting requested review from berkerpeksag berkerpeksag is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@erlend-aasland @colorfulappl @serhiy-storchaka @kumaraditya303 @bedevere-bot