Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"Paste mode" in the new REPL does not display the result of evaluated expressions #118893

Closed
AlexWaygood opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

"Paste mode" in the new REPL does not display the result of evaluated expressions #118893

AlexWaygood opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
3.13 bugs and security fixes 3.14 new features, bugs and security fixes topic-repl Related to the interactive shell type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Comments

@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

AlexWaygood commented May 10, 2024 •
edited by bedevere-app bot
Loading

We've discovered that if you manually type out a condition that evaluates to False in the new REPL, False is printed as the result, as expected...

>>> (3, 13, 0, "final") < (3, 13, 0, "beta")
False

...but that if you copy and paste this condition into the REPL, nothing is printed (implying that the condition evaluates to None:

>>> (3, 13, 0, "final") < (3, 13, 0, "beta")
>>>

Thanks @Eclips4 for realising that the difference in behaviour here was due to copying-and-pasting the condition rather than typing it out!

Originally posted by @AlexWaygood in #111201 (comment)

Linked PRs
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood added topic-repl Related to the interactive shell type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error 3.13 bugs and security fixes 3.14 new features, bugs and security fixes labels May 10, 2024
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood mentioned this issue May 10, 2024
Closed
7 tasks
@serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

It is not only with conditions, but with any expressions, including literals.

This was referenced May 14, 2024
Closed
Closed
pablogsal added a commit to pablogsal/cpython that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@pablogsal
pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately
c40ed58
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this issue May 21, 2024
Merged
pablogsal added a commit to pablogsal/cpython that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@pablogsal
pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately
fcc44e6
pablogsal added a commit to pablogsal/cpython that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@pablogsal
pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately
40df02e
pablogsal added a commit to pablogsal/cpython that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@pablogsal
pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately
a5cd942
pablogsal added a commit to pablogsal/cpython that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@pablogsal
pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately
06ccec4
ambv added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@pablogsal @ambv
gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (#119318)
a3e4fec 
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this issue May 22, 2024
@pablogsal @ambv @miss-islington
pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (p…
76b149e 
…ythonGH-119318)

(cherry picked from commit a3e4fec)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo Salgado <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this issue May 22, 2024
Merged
lysnikolaou pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2024
@miss-islington @pablogsal @ambv
[3.13] gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (G…
a463cd8 
…H-119318) (#119408)

(cherry picked from commit a3e4fec)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo Salgado <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like this is now fixed! (@pablogsal or @ambv please reopen if there's more to do!)

@JelleZijlstra JelleZijlstra mentioned this issue May 28, 2024
Closed
estyxx pushed a commit to estyxx/cpython that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
@pablogsal @ambv @estyxx
pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (p…
83f9099 
…ython#119318)

Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
3.13 bugs and security fixes 3.14 new features, bugs and security fixes topic-repl Related to the interactive shell type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@serhiy-storchaka @AlexWaygood