gh-91351: Fix some bugs in importlib handling of re-entrant imports (G…

…H-94504)

Co-authored-by: Brett Cannon <brett@python.org>

Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py

@@ -54,48 +54,164 @@ def _new_module(name):
 # A dict mapping module names to weakrefs of _ModuleLock instances
 # Dictionary protected by the global import lock
 _module_locks = {}
-# A dict mapping thread ids to _ModuleLock instances
+
+# A dict mapping thread IDs to lists of _ModuleLock instances.  This maps a
+# thread to the module locks it is blocking on acquiring.  The values are
+# lists because a single thread could perform a re-entrant import and be "in
+# the process" of blocking on locks for more than one module.  A thread can
+# be "in the process" because a thread cannot actually block on acquiring
+# more than one lock but it can have set up bookkeeping that reflects that
+# it intends to block on acquiring more than one lock.
 _blocking_on = {}
 
 
+class _BlockingOnManager:
+    """A context manager responsible to updating ``_blocking_on``."""
+    def __init__(self, thread_id, lock):
+        self.thread_id = thread_id
+        self.lock = lock
+
+    def __enter__(self):
+        """Mark the running thread as waiting for self.lock. via _blocking_on."""
+        # Interactions with _blocking_on are *not* protected by the global
+        # import lock here because each thread only touches the state that it
+        # owns (state keyed on its thread id).  The global import lock is
+        # re-entrant (i.e., a single thread may take it more than once) so it
+        # wouldn't help us be correct in the face of re-entrancy either.
+
+        self.blocked_on = _blocking_on.setdefault(self.thread_id, [])
+        self.blocked_on.append(self.lock)
+
+    def __exit__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+        """Remove self.lock from this thread's _blocking_on list."""
+        self.blocked_on.remove(self.lock)
+
+
 class _DeadlockError(RuntimeError):
     pass
 
 
+
+def _has_deadlocked(target_id, *, seen_ids, candidate_ids, blocking_on):
+    """Check if 'target_id' is holding the same lock as another thread(s).
+
+    The search within 'blocking_on' starts with the threads listed in
+    'candidate_ids'.  'seen_ids' contains any threads that are considered
+    already traversed in the search.
+
+    Keyword arguments:
+    target_id     -- The thread id to try to reach.
+    seen_ids      -- A set of threads that have already been visited.
+    candidate_ids -- The thread ids from which to begin.
+    blocking_on   -- A dict representing the thread/blocking-on graph.  This may
+                     be the same object as the global '_blocking_on' but it is
+                     a parameter to reduce the impact that global mutable
+                     state has on the result of this function.
+    """
+    if target_id in candidate_ids:
+        # If we have already reached the target_id, we're done - signal that it
+        # is reachable.
+        return True
+
+    # Otherwise, try to reach the target_id from each of the given candidate_ids.
+    for tid in candidate_ids:
+        if not (candidate_blocking_on := blocking_on.get(tid)):
+            # There are no edges out from this node, skip it.
+            continue
+        elif tid in seen_ids:
+            # bpo 38091: the chain of tid's we encounter here eventually leads
+            # to a fixed point or a cycle, but does not reach target_id.
+            # This means we would not actually deadlock.  This can happen if
+            # other threads are at the beginning of acquire() below.
+            return False
+        seen_ids.add(tid)
+
+        # Follow the edges out from this thread.
+        edges = [lock.owner for lock in candidate_blocking_on]
+        if _has_deadlocked(target_id, seen_ids=seen_ids, candidate_ids=edges,
+                blocking_on=blocking_on):
+            return True
+
+    return False
+
+
 class _ModuleLock:
     """A recursive lock implementation which is able to detect deadlocks
     (e.g. thread 1 trying to take locks A then B, and thread 2 trying to
     take locks B then A).
     """
 
     def __init__(self, name):
-        self.lock = _thread.allocate_lock()
+        # Create an RLock for protecting the import process for the
+        # corresponding module.  Since it is an RLock, a single thread will be
+        # able to take it more than once.  This is necessary to support
+        # re-entrancy in the import system that arises from (at least) signal
+        # handlers and the garbage collector.  Consider the case of:
+        #
+        #  import foo
+        #  -> ...
+        #     -> importlib._bootstrap._ModuleLock.acquire
+        #        -> ...
+        #           -> <garbage collector>
+        #              -> __del__
+        #                 -> import foo
+        #                    -> ...
+        #                       -> importlib._bootstrap._ModuleLock.acquire
+        #                          -> _BlockingOnManager.__enter__
+        #
+        # If a different thread than the running one holds the lock then the
+        # thread will have to block on taking the lock, which is what we want
+        # for thread safety.
+        self.lock = _thread.RLock()
         self.wakeup = _thread.allocate_lock()
+
+        # The name of the module for which this is a lock.
         self.name = name
+
+        # Can end up being set to None if this lock is not owned by any thread
+        # or the thread identifier for the owning thread.
         self.owner = None
-        self.count = 0
-        self.waiters = 0
+
+        # Represent the number of times the owning thread has acquired this lock
+        # via a list of True.  This supports RLock-like ("re-entrant lock")
+        # behavior, necessary in case a single thread is following a circular
+        # import dependency and needs to take the lock for a single module
+        # more than once.
+        #
+        # Counts are represented as a list of True because list.append(True)
+        # and list.pop() are both atomic and thread-safe in CPython and it's hard
+        # to find another primitive with the same properties.
+        self.count = []
+
+        # This is a count of the number of threads that are blocking on
+        # self.wakeup.acquire() awaiting to get their turn holding this module
+        # lock.  When the module lock is released, if this is greater than
+        # zero, it is decremented and `self.wakeup` is released one time.  The
+        # intent is that this will let one other thread make more progress on
+        # acquiring this module lock.  This repeats until all the threads have
+        # gotten a turn.
+        #
+        # This is incremented in self.acquire() when a thread notices it is
+        # going to have to wait for another thread to finish.
+        #
+        # See the comment above count for explanation of the representation.
+        self.waiters = []
 
     def has_deadlock(self):
-        # Deadlock avoidance for concurrent circular imports.
-        me = _thread.get_ident()
-        tid = self.owner
-        seen = set()
-        while True:
-            lock = _blocking_on.get(tid)
-            if lock is None:
-                return False
-            tid = lock.owner
-            if tid == me:
-                return True
-            if tid in seen:
-                # bpo 38091: the chain of tid's we encounter here
-                # eventually leads to a fixpoint or a cycle, but
-                # does not reach 'me'.  This means we would not
-                # actually deadlock.  This can happen if other
-                # threads are at the beginning of acquire() below.
-                return False
-            seen.add(tid)
+        # To avoid deadlocks for concurrent or re-entrant circular imports,
+        # look at _blocking_on to see if any threads are blocking
+        # on getting the import lock for any module for which the import lock
+        # is held by this thread.
+        return _has_deadlocked(
+            # Try to find this thread.
+            target_id=_thread.get_ident(),
+            seen_ids=set(),
+            # Start from the thread that holds the import lock for this
+            # module.
+            candidate_ids=[self.owner],
+            # Use the global "blocking on" state.
+            blocking_on=_blocking_on,
+        )
 
     def acquire(self):
         """
@@ -104,35 +220,78 @@ def acquire(self):
         Otherwise, the lock is always acquired and True is returned.
         """
         tid = _thread.get_ident()
-        _blocking_on[tid] = self
-        try:
+        with _BlockingOnManager(tid, self):
             while True:
+                # Protect interaction with state on self with a per-module
+                # lock.  This makes it safe for more than one thread to try to
+                # acquire the lock for a single module at the same time.
                 with self.lock:
-                    if self.count == 0 or self.owner == tid:
+                    if self.count == [] or self.owner == tid:
+                        # If the lock for this module is unowned then we can
+                        # take the lock immediately and succeed.  If the lock
+                        # for this module is owned by the running thread then
+                        # we can also allow the acquire to succeed.  This
+                        # supports circular imports (thread T imports module A
+                        # which imports module B which imports module A).
                         self.owner = tid
-                        self.count += 1
+                        self.count.append(True)
                         return True
+
+                    # At this point we know the lock is held (because count !=
+                    # 0) by another thread (because owner != tid).  We'll have
+                    # to get in line to take the module lock.
+
+                    # But first, check to see if this thread would create a
+                    # deadlock by acquiring this module lock.  If it would
+                    # then just stop with an error.
+                    #
+                    # It's not clear who is expected to handle this error.
+                    # There is one handler in _lock_unlock_module but many
+                    # times this method is called when entering the context
+                    # manager _ModuleLockManager instead - so _DeadlockError
+                    # will just propagate up to application code.
+                    #
+                    # This seems to be more than just a hypothetical -
+                    # https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59509154
+                    # https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/issues/7078
                     if self.has_deadlock():
-                        raise _DeadlockError('deadlock detected by %r' % self)
+                        raise _DeadlockError(f'deadlock detected by {self!r}')
+
+                    # Check to see if we're going to be able to acquire the
+                    # lock.  If we are going to have to wait then increment
+                    # the waiters so `self.release` will know to unblock us
+                    # later on.  We do this part non-blockingly so we don't
+                    # get stuck here before we increment waiters.  We have
+                    # this extra acquire call (in addition to the one below,
+                    # outside the self.lock context manager) to make sure
+                    # self.wakeup is held when the next acquire is called (so
+                    # we block).  This is probably needlessly complex and we
+                    # should just take self.wakeup in the return codepath
+                    # above.
                     if self.wakeup.acquire(False):
-                        self.waiters += 1
-                # Wait for a release() call
+                        self.waiters.append(None)
+
+                # Now take the lock in a blocking fashion.  This won't
+                # complete until the thread holding this lock
+                # (self.owner) calls self.release.
                 self.wakeup.acquire()
+
+                # Taking the lock has served its purpose (making us wait), so we can
+                # give it up now.  We'll take it w/o blocking again on the
+                # next iteration around this 'while' loop.
                 self.wakeup.release()
-        finally:
-            del _blocking_on[tid]
 
     def release(self):
         tid = _thread.get_ident()
         with self.lock:
             if self.owner != tid:
                 raise RuntimeError('cannot release un-acquired lock')
-            assert self.count > 0
-            self.count -= 1
-            if self.count == 0:
+            assert len(self.count) > 0
+            self.count.pop()
+            if not len(self.count):
                 self.owner = None
-                if self.waiters:
-                    self.waiters -= 1
+                if len(self.waiters) > 0:
+                    self.waiters.pop()
                     self.wakeup.release()
 
     def __repr__(self):

Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2023-01-06-09-22-21.gh-issue-91351.iq2vZ_.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Fix a case where re-entrant imports could corrupt the import deadlock
+detection code and cause a :exc:`KeyError` to be raised out of
+:mod:`importlib/_bootstrap`.  In addition to the straightforward cases, this
+could also happen when garbage collection leads to a warning being emitted --
+as happens when it collects an open socket or file)