-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support ImageFilter.BuiltinFilter for I;16* images #8438
Conversation
if mode[0] != "I" or ( | ||
callable(filter_to_apply) | ||
and issubclass(filter_to_apply, ImageFilter.BuiltinFilter) | ||
): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The isinstance
condition, added in #7108, was never true - each BuiltinFilter
run of this test uses a BuiltinFilter
class, not an instance. So this corrects it.
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ | |||
|
|||
#include "Imaging.h" | |||
|
|||
#define ROUND_UP(f) ((int)((f) >= 0.0 ? (f) + 0.5F : (f) - 0.5F)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we make this a function instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any particular reason?
This was copying
Pillow/src/libImaging/Reduce.c
Line 5 in 27c1bb2
#define ROUND_UP(f) ((int)((f) >= 0.0 ? (f) + 0.5F : (f) - 0.5F)) |
Pillow/src/libImaging/Resample.c
Line 5 in 27c1bb2
#define ROUND_UP(f) ((int)((f) >= 0.0 ? (f) + 0.5F : (f) - 0.5F)) |
If there's a reason to prefer functions, then maybe they should all be changed.
I'd suggest a common function for all three, except that this uses a float
and those other two use double
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functions are generally safer than macros, which need extra care around parentheses and don't get extra checking. But if this is a copy/paste of existing ones then we should be fine.
Helps #6667