Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix recursion error during file attachment parsing of deep nested paths #173
Fix recursion error during file attachment parsing of deep nested paths #173
Changes from 8 commits
9952110
3ea786f
2abd6cd
46dd830
99d6b96
6601b36
7ca3917
0ef2552
fb01ba2
6b0dba5
e924217
6441719
1af5bf0
de1327d
90910bd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Elegant use of a generator expression here!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thoughts on using
float("inf")
(akamath.inf
) instead ofNone
to specify no timeout? Maybe a bit odd at first glance, but I think it makes sense, and it does avoid dealing withNone
checks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like the None is still useful on performance grounds since we currently bypass the
time.monotonic
call and comparison whentimeout
is None.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have a test that asserts this time outs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a test parsing symlink files for timeout, but that doesn't determine if the timeout occured due to the
time.monotic()
comparison timeout or by the signal. The signal timeout would be if a very large single file was parsed, or pathlib ends up in some loop.But also added 2 new tests for
time_limit
successfully interruptingtime.sleep
and a long-running built-in C function (math.factorial) in 1af5bf0There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clever. I don't know enough about signals to say whether this is an appropriate use, but I think it's low risk to try.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to work pretty accurately for interrupting
time.sleep
and built-in C functions in these tests 1af5bf0, so it seems okay for our usecase, and avoids the potential broken pipes issue with multiprocessing.