Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

actually mark metafunc.addcall for removal in pytest 4.0 #2876

Closed
RonnyPfannschmidt opened this issue Oct 27, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

actually mark metafunc.addcall for removal in pytest 4.0 #2876

RonnyPfannschmidt opened this issue Oct 27, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels
good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor type: deprecation feature that will be removed in the future
Milestone
3.3

Comments

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

again a case of a deprecate documented things thatsnot triggering warnings
@nicoddemus nicoddemus added good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor type: deprecation feature that will be removed in the future labels Oct 27, 2017
nicoddemus added a commit to nicoddemus/pytest that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2017
@nicoddemus
Deprecate metafunc.addcall
4c00ae3 
Fix pytest-dev#2876
@nicoddemus nicoddemus mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2017
Merged
nicoddemus added a commit to nicoddemus/pytest that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2017
@nicoddemus
Deprecate metafunc.addcall
1f08d99 
Fix pytest-dev#2876
nicoddemus added a commit to nicoddemus/pytest that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2017
@nicoddemus
Add CHANGELOG entry for pytest-dev#2876
99ba3c9
@nicoddemus nicoddemus mentioned this issue Jan 5, 2018
Closed
@nicoddemus nicoddemus added this to the 3.3 milestone Jan 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue easy issue that is friendly to new contributor type: deprecation feature that will be removed in the future
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RonnyPfannschmidt @nicoddemus