Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/2.17.x] Exempt parents with only annotations from invalid-enum-extension #8835

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2023

Backport 538a8fe from #8834.

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 2.17.5 milestone Jul 8, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code label Jul 8, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8835 (dc59503) into maintenance/2.17.x (535a0a5) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/2.17.x    #8835   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               95.57%   95.57%           
===================================================
  Files                     178      178           
  Lines                   18838    18842    +4     
===================================================
+ Hits                    18004    18008    +4     
  Misses                    834      834           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/classes/class_checker.py 93.76% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit d690dd8 into maintenance/2.17.x Jul 8, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the backport-8834-to-maintenance/2.17.x branch July 8, 2023 05:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants