Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Type Hints] utils.normalized_cut #5665

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

akash-vartak
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rusty1s rusty1s changed the title [Type Hints] utils.normalized_cut [Type Hints] utils.normalized_cut Oct 12, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5665 (02ba98c) into master (5f1e0a8) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 02ba98c differs from pull request most recent head 3be7c0b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3be7c0b to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5665   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.86%   83.86%           
=======================================
  Files         349      349           
  Lines       19231    19232    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        16128    16129    +1     
  Misses       3103     3103           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
torch_geometric/utils/isolated.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
torch_geometric/utils/normalized_cut.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

torch_geometric/utils/normalized_cut.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rusty1s rusty1s enabled auto-merge (squash) October 13, 2022 06:24
@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit c466ffc into pyg-team:master Oct 13, 2022
JakubPietrakIntel pushed a commit to JakubPietrakIntel/pytorch_geometric that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2022
Co-authored-by: Matthias Fey <matthias.fey@tu-dortmund.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants