Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Electrode soh from c #2508

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Dec 10, 2022
Merged

Electrode soh from c #2508

merged 21 commits into from
Dec 10, 2022

Conversation

valentinsulzer
Copy link
Member

Description

Reformat electrode SOH a little bit, reducing duplicate code where possible.
Breaking changes:

  • renamed cap_init to Q_init
  • renamed inputs for electrode SOH calculations
  • changed input from n_Li to Q_Li for electrode SOH calculations

Added option to calculate initial stoichiometries from cell capacity (instead of cyclable lithium capacity), and/or from target voltage

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ flake8
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --unit
  • The documentation builds: $ cd docs and then $ make clean; make html

You can run all three at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer marked this pull request as draft November 30, 2022 01:37
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 99.72% // Head: 99.72% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (8076c44) compared to base (3961286).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2508   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.72%   99.72%           
========================================
  Files          270      270           
  Lines        19423    19487   +64     
========================================
+ Hits         19370    19434   +64     
  Misses          53       53           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pybamm/models/base_model.py 98.48% <ø> (ø)
...models/full_battery_models/lithium_ion/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ttery_models/lithium_ion/base_lithium_ion_model.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
..._battery_models/lithium_ion/basic_dfn_half_cell.py 99.01% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/full_battery_models/lithium_ion/electrode_soh.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...tery_models/lithium_ion/electrode_soh_half_cell.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/parameters/base_parameters.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/parameters/lithium_ion_parameters.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/parameters/parameter_values.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pybamm/simulation.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 1 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2022 16:21
Copy link
Contributor

@rtimms rtimms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @tinosulzer !

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer merged commit c38f385 into develop Dec 10, 2022
@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer deleted the electrode-soh-from-C branch December 10, 2022 03:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants