Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 1082 casadi #1089

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 30, 2020
Merged

Issue 1082 casadi #1089

merged 9 commits into from
Jun 30, 2020

Conversation

valentinsulzer
Copy link
Member

Description

Some small changes to the casadi solver, particularly adding the events to the solution. Leaving the issue open as there is other stuff to do

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ flake8
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --unit
  • The documentation builds: $ cd docs and then $ make clean; make html

You can run all three at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

Copy link
Sponsor Member

@brosaplanella brosaplanella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks Tino!

Copy link
Contributor

@rtimms rtimms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @tinosulzer looks good, just a small comment re the error raised

)
"Maximum number of decreased steps occurred at t={}. Try "
"solving the model up to this time only or reducing dt_max."
"".format(t)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we give the dimensional time in the error to make it easier for people to pass to t_eval. similar comment for dt_max

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1089 into develop will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1089   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.78%   97.78%           
========================================
  Files          242      242           
  Lines        12660    12662    +2     
========================================
+ Hits         12379    12381    +2     
  Misses         281      281           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pybamm/solvers/casadi_solver.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a4a57f8...ce4ca81. Read the comment docs.

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer merged commit fc2204a into develop Jun 30, 2020
@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer deleted the issue-1082-casadi branch June 30, 2020 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants