Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#1080 require t_eval #1086

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 30, 2020
Merged

#1080 require t_eval #1086

merged 8 commits into from
Jun 30, 2020

Conversation

rtimms
Copy link
Contributor

@rtimms rtimms commented Jun 29, 2020

Description

Make t_eval are required argument in sim.solve() when not using an experiment or drive cycle

Fixes #1080

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ flake8
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --unit
  • The documentation builds: $ cd docs and then $ make clean; make html

You can run all three at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1086 into develop will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1086      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    97.78%   97.78%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          242      242              
  Lines        12662    12658       -4     
===========================================
- Hits         12381    12377       -4     
  Misses         281      281              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pybamm/solvers/casadi_solver.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
pybamm/simulation.py 98.01% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fc2204a...5333fba. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Rob, looks great!

"list [t0, tf] where t0 is the initial time and tf is the "
"final time. "
"For a constant current (dis)charge the suggested 't_eval' "
"is [0, 4000/C] where C is the C-rate."
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Played around a little bit with this and I think we should suggest something closer to 3600 (e.g. 3700)

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer merged commit 0077553 into develop Jun 30, 2020
@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer deleted the issue-1080-require-t_eval branch June 30, 2020 22:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make t_eval a required (non-keyword) argument when solving
2 participants