Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SPM(e) with SEI growth or lithium plating #2098

Closed
brosaplanella opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2099
Closed

SPM(e) with SEI growth or lithium plating #2098

brosaplanella opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2099
Assignees

Comments

@brosaplanella
Copy link
Member

At the moment we average the SEI growth, lithium plating and porosity submodels for Single Particle Models. They don't need to be averaged (preprint available in arXiv very soon), so we should change the default.

This probably applies to crack and LAM submodels too, but I have not proved it so I will leave them as they are.

@brosaplanella brosaplanella self-assigned this Jun 9, 2022
brosaplanella added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2022
brosaplanella added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2022
brosaplanella added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2022
brosaplanella added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2022
brosaplanella added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2022
brosaplanella added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant