Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test numba to speed up convert_to_python=True #1864

Closed
martinjrobins opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

test numba to speed up convert_to_python=True #1864

martinjrobins opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
@martinjrobins

Comments

@martinjrobins
Copy link
Contributor

martinjrobins commented Dec 17, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Summary

Might be faster using convert_to_python if we use numba to compile it....? would help with the idklu solver. The other option to speed this one up is #1863. But this is easier so I want to give this one a go first

Motivation

Trying to speed up the ida solver so we can use its superior event handling
@martinjrobins martinjrobins self-assigned this Dec 17, 2021
@martinjrobins
Copy link
Contributor Author

martinjrobins commented Dec 17, 2021 •
edited
Loading

info on sparse matrix support for numba: numba/numba-scipy#29

@martinjrobins
Copy link
Contributor Author

could try this: http://csr.lenskit.org/en/stable/

martinjrobins added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 25, 2021
@martinjrobins
#1864 use numba jit and dict for python evaluator, not working due to…
9aa4582 
… lack of sparse matrix support
martinjrobins added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2022
@martinjrobins
#1864 saving progress for now. outstanding problem: the csr.CSR libra…
491dc3f 
…ry assumes that mat-vec is done for 1D vec
@kratman
Copy link
Contributor

kratman commented Mar 22, 2024

@martinjrobins Is this relevant anymore?

@kratman kratman added the needs-reply Needs further information from the author and may be closed if no response is received label Mar 22, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like there hasn't been a reply in 30 days, so I'm closing this issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the needs-reply Needs further information from the author and may be closed if no response is received label Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@martinjrobins martinjrobins

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@martinjrobins @kratman