Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add explicit support for discrete ANMs and some revisions #1086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

bloebp
Copy link
Member

@bloebp bloebp commented Nov 22, 2023

  • Add new Discrete Additive Noise Model class that enforces the outputs to be discrete. This should help in generating more consistent data.
  • As part of this, revised the auto assignment function and revised its docstring.
  • Revise the auto assignment summary.
  • Revise the evaluation summary.

@bloebp bloebp requested a review from petergtz November 22, 2023 18:55
@bloebp bloebp force-pushed the gcm_discrete_anm branch 3 times, most recently from 1671b62 to 944eb20 Compare November 22, 2023 22:56
@bloebp bloebp changed the title Add explicit support for discrete ANMs Add explicit support for discrete ANMs and other revisions Nov 22, 2023
@bloebp bloebp changed the title Add explicit support for discrete ANMs and other revisions Add explicit support for discrete ANMs and some revisions Nov 22, 2023
@bloebp bloebp force-pushed the gcm_discrete_anm branch 4 times, most recently from 30412cc to b5f3d5b Compare November 26, 2023 21:51
- Add new Discrete Additive Noise Model class that enforces the outputs to be discrete. This should help in generating more consistent data.
- As part of this, revised the auto assignment function and revised its docstring.
- Revise the auto assignment summary.
- Revise the evaluation summary.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Bloebaum <bloebp@amazon.com>
@bloebp bloebp merged commit c41cefc into main Nov 29, 2023
30 checks passed
@bloebp bloebp deleted the gcm_discrete_anm branch November 29, 2023 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants