Separate display of power tags from normal tags

[jywarren]

This has been marked as a good candidate for becoming a first-timers-only issue like these, meaning that it's simple, self-contained, and with some extra formatting, could be a great entry point for a new contributor. If you're familiar enough with this code, please consider reformatting or reposting it as a first-timers-only issue, and then ping @jywarren to get it labelled.

---

Power tags (in key:value format) and regular tags are mixed in display:

https://publiclab.org/notes/liz/08-30-2016/check-out-these-activity-grids#tags

We should show the power tags separately, perhaps show them in purple or grey, and also link the words "Power tags" in the label to the above explanation of them.

This may also be where we could show an expanded interface for adding powertags, as in #496 -- and should in any case link to power tags documentation at https://publiclab.org/wiki/power-tags

Tags are displayed in this template: https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/blob/master/app/views/tag/_tagging.html.erb#L5

@node.community_tags, used there, is defined here -- it's just an alias to an ActiveRecord relation: https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/blob/master/app/models/drupal_node.rb#L436

We should use the more specific @node.power_tag_objects and @node.normal_tags to separate these out (see here for docs).

If we can think of a more compact way to display these, that'd be great, too!

[jywarren]

@ananyo2012 , perhaps this'd be a good GCI candidate?

[ananyo2012]

Yes this involves work on CSS and designing as well. A good GCI candidate.

[gaeun]

I'd like to work on this issue please. :)

[ananyo2012]

Sure 😊 Happy to offer any help! ᐧ

…

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Gaeun Kim ***@***.***> wrote: I'd like to work on this issue please. :) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#775 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKACR8yUZIG57Iu3AlCG8YrXmEmouqheks5rPHTegaJpZM4Jy_Dp> .

[gaeun]

@ananyo2012 @jywarren I think we can close this via #1174.

[ananyo2012]

Ah thanks!