Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(Azure TDE): add filter for master DB #6514

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

prowler-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport

This will backport the following commits from master to v5.1:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@prowler-bot prowler-bot requested review from a team as code owners January 14, 2025 17:35
@prowler-bot prowler-bot added the backport This PR contains a backport label Jan 14, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.05%. Comparing base (fef332a) to head (ec06360).
Report is 1 commits behind head on v5.1.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             v5.1    #6514      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.05%   90.05%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1182     1182              
  Lines       36077    36079       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        32489    32490       +1     
- Misses       3588     3589       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
prowler 90.05% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
prowler 90.05% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
api ∅ <ø> (∅)

@MrCloudSec MrCloudSec merged commit 7026599 into v5.1 Jan 14, 2025
10 checks passed
@MrCloudSec MrCloudSec deleted the backport/v5.1/pr-6351 branch January 14, 2025 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport This PR contains a backport
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants