Update examples

[wang-boyu]

• update examples folder structure to be consistent with Mesa
• add test case for the examples in the same way as Mesa
• add a geo_schelling_points example

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #74 (0b23818) into master (419f395) will increase coverage by 10.46%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #74       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   75.20%   85.67%   +10.46%     
===========================================
  Files           5        5               
  Lines         363      363               
  Branches       57       57               
===========================================
+ Hits          273      311       +38     
+ Misses         69       37       -32     
+ Partials       21       15        -6     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
mesa_geo/geoagent.py	78.16% <0.00%> (+5.74%)	⬆️
mesa_geo/geospace.py	88.26% <0.00%> (+14.34%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 419f395...0b23818. Read the comment docs.

[rht]

I am actually in favor of a flatter file structure hierarchy, instead of example_model/example_model/model.py. There are not that many files anyway. See also: projectmesa/mesa#1269. We can bring this up in the meeting this month.

[wang-boyu]

Yup it's probably a matter of personal preferences. No matter what it is, it would be better to be consistent, and updated in the document here. We can discuss this later.

[rht]

Hash examples:

• https://core.hash.ai/@hash/wildfires-regrowth/main
• https://core.hash.ai/@hash/virus-mutation-and-drug-resistance/main

They seem to do it like how MATLAB does for its functions: 1 file per function.

[wang-boyu]

I've updated the geo_sir and geo_schelling examples to the flat folder structure, while keeping the geo_schelling_points folder structure.

[rht]

LGTM