Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use checkboxes for multi-select #3071

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Use checkboxes for multi-select #3071

merged 9 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

camertron
Copy link
Contributor

@camertron camertron commented Sep 9, 2024

Authors: Please fill out this form carefully and completely.

Reviewers: By approving this Pull Request you are approving the code change, as well as its deployment and mitigation plans.
Please read this description carefully. If you feel there is anything unclear or missing, please ask for updates.

What are you trying to accomplish?

This PR updates the SelectPanel component to show bounded checkboxes in multi-select mode in keeping with our design mockups.

Screenshots

Before After
A screenshot of the SelectPanel component with a number of list items. One of the list items features an unbounded check mark, i.e. a check mark without a square box around it. A screenshot of the SelectPanel component with a number of list items. All but one of the list items features an empty square on its left. The square for one of the items is filled in with a blue check mark.

Integration

No changes necessary in production.

List the issues that this change affects.

Closes https://github.com/github/primer/issues/3933

Risk Assessment

  • Low risk the change is small, highly observable, and easily rolled back.
  • Medium risk changes that are isolated, reduced in scope or could impact few users. The change will not impact library availability.
  • High risk changes are those that could impact customers and SLOs, low or no test coverage, low observability, or slow to rollback.

What approach did you choose and why?

The ActionList component already supports select_variant: :multiple_checkbox, so it was a simple matter of passing that option when constructing the list.

Accessibility

  • No new axe scan violation - This change does not introduce any new axe scan violations.

Merge checklist

- [ ] Added/updated tests
- [ ] Added/updated documentation

  • Added/updated previews (Lookbook)
    - [ ] Tested in Chrome
    - [ ] Tested in Firefox
    - [ ] Tested in Safari
    - [ ] Tested in Edge

Take a look at the What we look for in reviews section of the contributing guidelines for more information on how we review PRs.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 9, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9ba0bee

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@primer/view-components Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2024

⚠️ Visual differences found

Our visual comparison tests found UI differences. Please review the differences by viewing the files changed tab to ensure that the changes were intentional.

Review visual differences

@camertron camertron marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2024 22:33
@camertron camertron requested review from a team as code owners September 9, 2024 22:33
Copy link
Member

@jonrohan jonrohan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome 🙌🏻 checkbox as it should be

@camertron camertron merged commit e043069 into main Sep 12, 2024
37 checks passed
@camertron camertron deleted the select_panel_checkboxes branch September 12, 2024 21:25
@primer primer bot mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants