Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing deprecated ImageCrop component #1550

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jonrohan
Copy link
Member

@jonrohan jonrohan commented Oct 28, 2022

Description

There are currently no uses of Primer::ImageCrop in production. Removing the deprecated component from the repository. We moved this component to Primer::Alpha::ImageCrop which is the same component.

Integration

Does this change require any updates to code in production?

Verify no uses popped up before shipping. We have a linter to discourage it, but it could still have happened.

Merge checklist

  • Added/updated tests
  • Added/updated documentation
  • Added/updated previews

@jonrohan jonrohan requested review from a team and keithamus October 28, 2022 00:06
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 28, 2022

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: baf8548

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@primer/view-components Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ruby Pull requests that update Ruby code label Oct 28, 2022
@jonrohan jonrohan merged commit 8211b26 into main Oct 28, 2022
@jonrohan jonrohan deleted the remove_deprecated_imagecrop branch October 28, 2022 17:17
@primer-css primer-css mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ruby Pull requests that update Ruby code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants