Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add "normal" glibc build #63

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

add "normal" glibc build #63

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wolfv
Copy link
Member

@wolfv wolfv commented Jun 7, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@baszalmstra baszalmstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder, what is the advantage of having this target? Wont the binary be tied the platform its build on?

@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ jobs:
matrix:
job:
- { name: "Linux-x86_64", target: x86_64-unknown-linux-musl, os: ubuntu-20.04, use-cross: true }
- { name: "Linux-x86_64", target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, os: ubuntu-20.04 }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe change the name so that the linux builds can easily be distinguished?

@baszalmstra
Copy link
Contributor

With the issue in rattler fixed (conda/rattler#209), should we close this?

@wolfv wolfv closed this Jun 8, 2023
@ruben-arts ruben-arts deleted the glibvc branch June 8, 2023 14:05
tdejager added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
Refactors the `pixi add` code to use the same code path as `update` and
`install`. This provides:

* A more correct result
* Speed, because now everything is done in parallel
* Progress Reporting!
* Version caps for pypi deps:
Fixes: #63
Fixes: #1506

---------

Co-authored-by: Tim de Jager <tim@prefix.dev>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants