Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resample bug, see #137 #138

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 30, 2022
Merged

Resample bug, see #137 #138

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 30, 2022

Conversation

jonasvdd
Copy link
Member

See #137 137

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 22, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #138 (61ec015) into main (b3f06fe) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #138   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.45%   97.45%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         865      865           
=======================================
  Hits          843      843           
  Misses         22       22           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ler/figure_resampler/figure_resampler_interface.py 99.73% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Comment on lines 402 to 403
# TODO -> why did we make this assumption
y_axis = "y" # + xaxis_filter[1:]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is also a mystery to me 🙃

@@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ trace-updater = ">=0.0.8"
numpy = ">=1.14"
Flask-Cors = "^3.0.10"
orjson = "^3.8.0" # Faster json serialization
Werkzeug = "2.1.2" # Fixating werkzeug version because of:
# TODO -> check other werkzeug versions: 2.1.2 and 2.1.1 seem to work.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be included in this PR? For me it's fine to move this to another PR

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it can be included!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will merge this PR and leave this for what it is

Copy link
Member

@jvdd jvdd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just check my comment wrt werkzeug versioning

Copy link
Member Author

@jonasvdd jonasvdd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jvdd
Copy link
Member

jvdd commented Nov 24, 2022

Guess the only thing blocking merging this PR is checking other werkzeug versions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants