Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix iidm post-processor doc #852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Fix iidm post-processor doc #852

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

flo-dup
Copy link
Contributor

@flo-dup flo-dup commented Oct 1, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
No

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Doc fix

What is the current behavior?
doc refers to unknown parameter post_processor_names

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
doc refers to post_processors

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
@flo-dup flo-dup requested a review from geofjamg October 1, 2024 14:10
@geofjamg geofjamg merged commit bb31cb4 into main Oct 1, 2024
7 checks passed
@geofjamg geofjamg deleted the fix_post_processor_doc branch October 1, 2024 15:15
@jeandemanged
Copy link
Member

hello @flo-dup @geofjamg
aye I did it also in #847 last week... should have pinged you.

is the pybind update intentional ?

geofjamg added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
@geofjamg geofjamg mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2024
7 tasks
@geofjamg
Copy link
Member

geofjamg commented Oct 1, 2024

is the pybind update intentional ?

No, I reverted the update

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants