Dsl logger #257
Merged
Dsl logger #257
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
# Conflicts: # dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/models/generators/GridFormingConverterGroovyExtension.groovy # dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/models/generators/WeccGenGroovyExtension.groovy # dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/models/hvdc/AbstractHvdcBuilder.groovy # dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/models/hvdc/HvdcPvGroovyExtension.groovy # dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/models/hvdc/HvdcVscGroovyExtension.groovy # dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/models/svarcs/SvarcGroovyExtension.groovy # dynawaltz-dsl/src/test/java/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/DynamicModelsSupplierTest.java # dynawaltz-dsl/src/test/java/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/EventModelsSupplierTest.java
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
...tz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/events/NodeFaultEventGroovyExtension.groovy
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...altz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/models/svarcs/SvarcGroovyExtension.groovy
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
gautierbureau
approved these changes
Jul 6, 2023
gautierbureau
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2023
flo-dup
requested changes
Sep 25, 2023
dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/DslVariousEquipment.groovy
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dynawaltz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/DslVariousEquipment.groovy
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/builders/AbstractEquipmentModelBuilder.groovy
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...altz-dsl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/builders/AbstractEventModelBuilder.groovy
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...sl/src/main/groovy/com/powsybl/dynawaltz/dsl/builders/AbstractPureDynamicModelBuilder.groovy
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: lisrte <laurent.issertial@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
flo-dup
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2023
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature
What is the current behavior?
In groovy script an exception is thrown everytime an error occurs in the builders (missing data, wrong equipment type, etc).
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Log errors and skip instantiation instead of throwing exception.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
Other information: