Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to catalogue #828

Closed
7 of 10 tasks
aays opened this issue Mar 30, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #863
Closed
7 of 10 tasks

Add Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to catalogue #828

aays opened this issue Mar 30, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #863
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Species Issues relating to species data in the catalog

Comments

@aays
Copy link
Contributor

aays commented Mar 30, 2021

  • Name: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
  • Common name: n/a

Description: unicellular isogamous alga with a haploid 110 Mb genome - used in studies of cell motility, but also more recently as a model for evolutionary genetics (especially in light of its facultatively sexual life cycle)


Note: Maybe you don't know a lot of the things below - but, that's OK!
The criteria are that (a) the choice is reasonable, and (b) the rationale is clear.
What we want is a "reasonable estimate" (or, "best guess") - if you were to use a number in a paper,
what would you use and how would you justify it to your collaborators?
For instance, for "generation time", best would be to cite a paper that actually measures
or estimates generation time. But most species don't have this;
next best would be to give a number used in the literature, and provide a citation that used it
(and hopefully the publication gives a justification also).
Lacking this, you might provide a number from a related species (and a citation for this).

Here is the checklist of things that we need to add a species to the catalogue.
Each thing should be provided, with a justification (maybe short) and a citation.

Demographic information:

  • generation time in years
    • ~2.4 mitotic doublings per day -> 365 * 2.4 = 876 doublings per year (Vitova et al 2011, link)
    • 1/876 = 0.0011 years/generation
    • I hope I did this right - please correct me if I'm wrong!
  • "default" population size
    • 1.4 * 10^7 (Ness et al 2016, link)

Chromosome structure:

Note: The assembly should be chromosome-level, i.e., not composed of thousands of scaffolds.

  • ensembl assembly ID or, if the assembly is not in Ensembl, a list of chromosomes with name and length (in bp)

Recombination rates:

  • genetic map of recombination rates (as a hapmap or csv file)
  • genome-wide mean recombination rate (which will be used as the default)
    • 0.015 cM/Mb (Hasan and Ness 2020, link)
    • This is = rho / 2Ne, and is two orders of magnitude lower than lab estimates (9.15 cM/Mb)! But if simulating wild populations of C. reinhardtii, in the absence of a means of modifying the rate of sex in natural populations, this value already takes the infrequency of sex into account
    • If a means of modifying the rate of sex is implemented into stdpopsim, then the 9.15 cM/Mb value is appropriate to use when simulating natural populations, provided the rate of sex is set to 1/840 (see Hasan and Ness 2020)
    • But it is important to note that this is NOT the expected recombination rate in a single cross of C. reinhardtii, and is in fact substantially lower!

Mutation rate:

  • genome-wide mean mutation rate
    • μ = 9.63 × 10^−10 (Ness et al 2015, link)

Demographic model:

  • as a list of population sizes, growth rates, migration rates, etcetera. (optional)
  • citation

Other information:

These are things we don't currently use, but will want to use in the future:

  • sex determination system, and which chromosomes are the sex chromosome(s)
    • C. reinhardtii is an isogamous, heterothallic species with mating types determined by a ~500 kb locus on chromosome 6
    • individuals are either MT+ or MT- based on which allele is present at said locus
    • see Umen 2011 for more details
  • ploidy
    • haploid
@aays aays added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 30, 2021
@jeromekelleher jeromekelleher added the Species Issues relating to species data in the catalog label Apr 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Species Issues relating to species data in the catalog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants