Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(python): Don't enforce row order in join test results where not guaranteed #17596

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

brandon-b-miller
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Polars team, while working on the GPU backend I encountered a few join tests that seem to rely on the order of rows returned by the join to pass, where the docs only indicate a particular ordering for left joins. This PR proposes some minor changes to the py-polars test suite that drop this as a pass condition in the places I encountered it. Hopefully I've not missed any obvious ones here, let me know if so.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.44%. Comparing base (b40be85) to head (529f6f4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17596      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.45%   80.44%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1484     1484              
  Lines      195594   195594              
  Branches     2778     2778              
==========================================
- Hits       157368   157340      -28     
- Misses      37714    37742      +28     
  Partials      512      512              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit da1ce87 into pola-rs:main Jul 12, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants