Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add progress bars to backtest.py #423

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

nathanramoscfa
Copy link
Contributor

@nathanramoscfa nathanramoscfa commented Sep 13, 2023

What's Changed

  • Modified backtest.py to display a progress bar during calculations.

Add progress bars to backtest.py
@nathanramoscfa nathanramoscfa changed the title Update backtest.py Add progress bars to backtest.py Sep 13, 2023
Modified the pinned version of tqdm as requested.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (2581278) 45.47% compared to head (38767ce) 45.50%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
bt/backtest.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #423      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.47%   45.50%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines        1935     1936       +1     
  Branches      449      449              
==========================================
+ Hits          880      881       +1     
  Misses        998      998              
  Partials       57       57              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants