Improve the low_battery-related code, also take the battery-critically-low warning notification into account. #610
Conversation
Plugwise changes the message to a warning notification when the battery-level becomes critically low.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@bouwew has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent updates involve version 1.2.0 of the "plugwise" project, which enhances low battery notifications for battery-powered devices. This version introduces critical battery warnings and simplifies the logic for detecting low battery status. Additionally, the project version number has been updated to indicate the transition to an alpha release, reflecting ongoing improvements. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #610 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 3342 3345 +3
=========================================
+ Hits 3342 3345 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- plugwise/data.py (2 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- pyproject.toml
Additional comments not posted (2)
plugwise/data.py (1)
70-70: Simplification of low battery condition approved.The new condition for checking low battery status is more straightforward, which should improve maintainability.
However, verify that this new condition accurately detects low battery across all relevant device types.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-6: Changelog update for v1.2.0 is clear and concise.The entry effectively communicates the improvements made in the low battery-related code and the handling of critically low battery warnings.
plugwise/data.py
Outdated
| warning: str | None = notification.get("warning") | ||
| notify = message or warning | ||
| if notify is not None and all(x in notify for x in matches) and (mac_addresses := mac_pattern.findall(notify)): | ||
| mac_address = mac_addresses[0] # re.findall() outputs a list | ||
|
|
||
| if mac_address is not None: | ||
| if mac_address is not None and message is not None: # only block message-type notifications |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhancements to notification handling approved.
The addition of a warning message and the check for non-null notifications before processing are good improvements.
Consider adding unit tests to ensure that the new logic handles both message and warning types correctly.
Would you like me to help by generating the unit testing code or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- plugwise/data.py (3 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- plugwise/data.py
- pyproject.toml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- plugwise/data.py (2 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- plugwise/data.py
- pyproject.toml
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation