Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Climate-test: implement freezer.tick constructs #722

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Climate-test: implement freezer.tick constructs #722

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented Sep 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced testing functionality for climate entity attributes in the Plugwise integration.
    • Improved time manipulation in tests for more accurate state verification of climate entities.
    • Updated changelog to reflect ongoing improvements and added a new section for recent changes related to time manipulation in tests.
  • Chores
    • Incremented version number from 0.53.1 to 0.53.2 in the manifest file.

@bouwew bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 16:49
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the testing functionality for climate entity attributes in the Plugwise integration for Home Assistant. The updates introduce the freezer fixture from the freezegun library to control time during tests, replacing the previous reliance on utcnow(). This allows for precise time manipulation, improving the accuracy of time-dependent assertions in the tests.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/components/plugwise/test_climate.py Introduced freezer fixture for time manipulation in test_adam_3_climate_entity_attributes and test_anna_climate_entity_climate_changes.
CHANGELOG.md Updated to include a new section for version v0.53.2, noting the implementation of freezer.tick constructs and Core PR #126212.
custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json Updated version number from "0.53.1" to "0.53.2".

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix climate-test failing #699: This PR modifies the test_adam_climate_entity_climate_changes function in tests/components/plugwise/test_climate.py, which is also a focus of the main PR, enhancing error handling in climate tests.
  • Some small updates #712: This PR updates the CHANGELOG.md to include a new section titled "Ongoing," similar to the main PR's changelog updates, indicating a focus on documenting ongoing improvements in the testing functionality.
  • Show model_id for P1 gateway as well, bump plugwise to v1.4.0 #714: This PR adds a model_id attribute in the async_setup_entry function in custom_components/plugwise/__init__.py, which may relate to the overall functionality being tested in the climate tests of the main PR.
  • While writing 126212 in Core does the same :) #718: This PR introduces the freezer object in tests/components/plugwise/test_init.py to manage time during tests, similar to the changes made in the main PR for time manipulation in climate entity tests.

Suggested labels

enhancement, bug, dependencies

Poem

In the garden of code where the rabbits play,
Time ticks gently, guiding the way.
With freezer in hand, we leap and we bound,
Testing the climate, where changes are found.
Hooray for the updates, let the bunnies cheer,
For accuracy reigns, and the future is clear! 🐰✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9dec1d and 86634c9.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • custom_components/plugwise/manifest.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bouwew bouwew force-pushed the improve-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 6781192 to 81fc6a5 Compare September 18, 2024 16:53
@bouwew bouwew marked this pull request as draft September 18, 2024 16:55
@bouwew bouwew marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2024 06:06
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 20, 2024

@bouwew bouwew merged commit cf7aa81 into main Sep 20, 2024
8 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the improve-tests branch September 20, 2024 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants