Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extensionality not required for proof of neg any equiv all neg #1086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025
Merged

Extensionality not required for proof of neg any equiv all neg #1086

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

negatratoron
Copy link
Contributor

@negatratoron negatratoron commented Jan 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Closes #1085

@wenkokke wenkokke enabled auto-merge January 24, 2025 21:26
@wenkokke wenkokke added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 24, 2025
wadler
wadler approved these changes Jan 24, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@wadler wadler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Merged via the queue into plfa:dev with commit 1824aed Jan 24, 2025
12 checks passed
@negatratoron negatratoron deleted the extensionality-not-required-for-neg-any-equiv-all-neg branch January 24, 2025 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wadler wadler wadler approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Exercise ¬Any≃All¬ does not necessarily need extensionality
3 participants
@negatratoron @wadler @wenkokke