Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cherry-pick] make tispark reading data from a hash partition table #1089

Merged

Conversation

marsishandsome
Copy link
Collaborator

cherry-pick #966

@marsishandsome marsishandsome force-pushed the feature/cherry-pick-996 branch from 8d1765a to 8425b50 Compare September 2, 2019 03:59
@marsishandsome
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/run-all-tests

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release-2.1@890d175). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             release-2.1   #1089   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage               ?   53.4%           
  Complexity             ?    1122           
=============================================
  Files                  ?     153           
  Lines                  ?    7024           
  Branches               ?     817           
=============================================
  Hits                   ?    3751           
  Misses                 ?    2900           
  Partials               ?     373
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...ain/java/com/pingcap/tikv/meta/TiPartitionDef.java 81.81% <33.33%> (ø) 4 <0> (?)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 890d175...8425b50. Read the comment docs.

@marsishandsome marsishandsome merged commit f412825 into pingcap:release-2.1 Sep 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants