Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modify cached_gc_safe_point to atomic to prevent more request to PD #5079

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 14, 2022
Merged

modify cached_gc_safe_point to atomic to prevent more request to PD #5079

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 14, 2022

Conversation

shuke987
Copy link
Contributor

@shuke987 shuke987 commented Jun 7, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

safe_point_last_update_time is used to prevent every gc_safe_point request calling PD. But it is not atmoic, thus when getGCSafePointWithRetry calling by multiple threads, it may not worked as expected. Fix this.

Issue Number: ref #4928

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jun 7, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Lloyd-Pottiger
  • breezewish

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 7, 2022
@JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

https://ci.pingcap.net/blue/organizations/jenkins/tiflash-build-common/detail/tiflash-build-common/6122/pipeline

need to format the codes by using the format-diff.py script https://github.com/pingcap/tiflash#contributing

@JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

I changed it to be ref #4928 cause we can avoid useless calls to PD #4928 (comment)

Copy link
Member

@breezewish breezewish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rest LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jun 10, 2022
@breezewish
Copy link
Member

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jun 10, 2022

Coverage for changed files

Filename                                                                                                    Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/home/jenkins/agent/workspace/tiflash-build-common/tiflash/dbms/src/Storages/Transaction/PDTiKVClient.h           9                 9     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%          25                25     0.00%           4                 4     0.00%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                                                                                             9                 9     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%          25                25     0.00%           4                 4     0.00%

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18281      9730             46.78%    205105  97566        52.43%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

Copy link
Contributor

@Lloyd-Pottiger Lloyd-Pottiger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jun 13, 2022
@flowbehappy
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@flowbehappy: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 282edde

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jun 14, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@shuke987: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@sre-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

sre-bot commented Jun 14, 2022

Coverage for changed files

Filename                                                                                                    Regions    Missed Regions     Cover   Functions  Missed Functions  Executed       Lines      Missed Lines     Cover    Branches   Missed Branches     Cover
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/home/jenkins/agent/workspace/tiflash-build-common/tiflash/dbms/src/Storages/Transaction/PDTiKVClient.h           9                 9     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%          25                25     0.00%           4                 4     0.00%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                                                                                                             9                 9     0.00%           1                 1     0.00%          25                25     0.00%           4                 4     0.00%

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
18322      9641             47.38%    205717  96597        53.04%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 4b3a2ce into pingcap:master Jun 14, 2022
guo-shaoge added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2022
guo-shaoge added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants